Garden Muse, 2001

I think we can all agree that the digital  age has ushered in an era of unparalleled  access to image making. There is a Photoshop plug in for nearly every look that Hollywood and pop culture has thrown at us. I do have to admit, though I like the “Thermopylae” setting in OnOne Software’s Photo Tools plug in for Photoshop.

Thermopylae

Original

Digital imaging has made available to the masses whole worlds that were previously the domain of only a select few. Almost anybody these days can go out and make a Baraka, or shoot models and have them look like they where shot by David LaChapelle. It’s incredible

Sometimes though, I feel like I’m cheating. I feel that at some point I lose the connection with my work. I know some of you out there feel the same way. You feel like there is a lack of process. There is no darkroom. There is no light sensitive emulsion or concoction of chemicals with  fussy temperatures and rituals of submersion and agitation. At some point it’s just an automated parade of 1′s and 0′s.

For those of you who aren’t in the know, you’ve come to the right place. There are several movements afoot that put process back in the hands of the digital image maker. Pioneers of Alternative Photo Process such as Dan Burkholder and Christopher James have written tomes about coating substrates with various light sensitive emulsions and exposing them through digital negatives.

There are others, such as myself, who’s approach lends itself more towards the printmaking end of the spectrum. Class, this shall be the main point of our discussion today.

I’m sure there are a few of you out there who did Polaroid Transfers back in the day. There are probably even a few that have experimented with various transfer techniques using inkjet media, transferring with acetone or gel medium. So, how many of you have heard of using Purell Hand Sanitizing Gel to facilitate  image transfer? I know, it sounds ridiculous, but I’m absolutely serious. See Exhibit A.

Purell transfer on to Rives BFK paper

So, I guess your wondering how its done. Well, it goes something like this.

1. You need to print the image (reversed or rotated horizontally) on to some kind of clear film. I typically print on HP Clear Film. If you don’t have a printer that accepts rolls, your options shrink substantially, but don’t despair. InkPress recently introduced a Clear Film (not to be confused with Transparency Media, Transparency Media will not work for these kinds of transfer processes) that is available in sheets and rolls.

Purell Transfer on Rives BFK. Image transferred from Inkpress Clear Film

2. You need to pick a substrate. I find that printmaking papers such as Arches 88 or Rives BFK work the best. However, I do like to experiment with various fine art papers.

Purell Transfer on Fine Art Paper

For this exercise I’ll assume you have chosen a print making paper such as Rives BFK. You will need a few more items, also.

A. Purell hand Gel

B. 11×14 piece of glass, lexan, or plexi

C. a Brayer (Speedball Hard Rubber works the best for me)

3. Place your paper on your piece of glass, lexan, or plexi.

4. Pump a few squirts of Purell Hand Gel onto the paper. Use the brayer to spread it around, eventually coating that entire side.

5. Flip the paper, if you have excess Purell on the edges use the brayer to work the excess back onto the paper. Pump a couple more squirts on to the paper and work it evenly with the brayer.

6. Flip the paper over again. Make sure the paper is evenly coated with Purell, but not to wet. At this point you are are ready to apply the image, usually I start at the edge, (printed side facing the paper) bowing the image away from my body. Slowly roll the image out to ensure there is even contact between the image and the paper. Then take the brayer, applying a moderate amount of force, roll it back and forth across all areas of the image.  You can stop and lift a corner to see how the transfer is progressing. If your having a problem spot, you can use the backside of a spoon to burnish that area. It shouldn’t take more then 3 minutes to obtain a decent transfer. This is all about practice and developing technique.

This is pretty cool right? But wait, there’s more! This is all pretty simple, and cool because it is a legitimate process that ensures a unique result.  For me though, it’s not always enough. Sometimes I like to take something sharp and scratch the hell out of the image before I transfer it. You get the idea here, the image can be modified, degraded, etc. numerous ways prior to transfer.

Purell Transfer, with scratches applied prior to transfer.

Sometimes this still isn’t enough. That is why I’ve saved the best for last.  How many of you have heard of a little company called InkAid? InkAid makes inkjet precoats. This means that you buy a jar of this stuff and it will allow you to coat almost anything you can fit into your printer. I’ve coated aluminum, canvas, and hand made fine art papers with this stuff and then run it through my printer (Canon iPF6200) with amazing results (which will be the topic of a coming blog entry). Anyway, turns out you can coat acetate or in this case Duralar with it. Specifically InkAid Clear Gloss Type II.  All you do is paint on a couple of coats as per the instructions, and then print on it like any other clear film. The results are interesting, and as you become more proficient, you can achieve more interesting effects based on how you paint the precoat on. Not to mention the Duralar can be re-used. Below is my example.

Purell Transfer from Duralar coated with Ink Aid Clear Gloss Type II

As you can see there is a whole world of possibilities that exist when you combine digital imaging with basic print making techniques. I can assure you that this is just the tip of the ice berg. It is possible not only to re-connect with your photography, but to take it to levels you never knew existed.

I firmly believe that for any society to endure it must place paramount importance on art and free expression. When you think of New York City, what thoughts come to mind? Sure, first maybe the bright lights of Times Square;  the incomprehensibly high Empire State Building, the sea of yellow cabs flowing on 5th Avenue; people walking shoulder to shoulder in Midtown, the subways thundering underneath.  But what does New York City symbolize to you? Think about that while you read the rest of this post.

As some of you may be aware,  I sell my photography in Union Square Park in New York City. For those of you who have know idea where or what Union Square is, I have a short analogy for you. New York City is very much a living, breathing entity. Union Square is the heart that keeps the blood flowing. It is the convergence of the NRQW, 456, and L trains. The amount of people above and under ground at Union Sq at any given moment is just staggering.

My endeavors there are why it is so hard for me to keep up with this blog, and for that I apologize. Anyway, enough of the BS. The long and the short of it is this; Michael Bloomberg and his flunkies at the NYC Parks Department are seeking to revise the rules with regards to the Artists that sell in 4 NYC parks.  The Artists of Central Park, Union Square Park, Battery City Park, and the High Line Park are in the cross hairs of these revisions. Currently there are 60 pages of rules that regulate what we can and cannot sell, where we can and cannot set up, and the size of our displays, etc. Currently there are no regulations on how many artists can set up on a given street, or a given park. The new rules seek to change just that. The old rules remain in effect, however the proposed ones severely limit how many artists can set up in the a fore mentioned  parks. Below are the proposed numbers:

* Battery Park, only 9 artists allowed
* Metropolitan Museum of Art (between 79th and 81st streets) 12 artists.
* Fifth Avenue (between 84th and 85th streets) 12 artists.
* Union Square Park 18 artists allowed.
* Columbus Circle, 4 artists.
* Wein Walk (near the Central Park Zoo) 8 artists
* High Line Park, 3 artists
* Central Park South, 5 artists
* Grand Army Plaza (by Plaza Hotel), 8 artists

So as you can see Union Square is only allowed 18. I took a head count on Saturday, and by 11AM there where 127 vendors present. I guess what you are all wondering now is why? Surely there must be a reasonable and logical justification for this.. I will present an excerpt from the Statement of Basis and Purpose of the new proposal as the argument for revising the existing rules.

These rules are promulgated pursuant to the authority of the Commissioner of the
Department of Parks and Recreation (the “Commissioner”) under sections 389, 533(a)(9) and
1043 of the New York City Charter.  The Commissioner is authorized to establish and enforce
rules for the use, governance and protection of public parks and of all property under the charge
or control of the Department of Parks and Recreation.

The proposed rules provide reasonable opportunities – by and through limited time,
place, and manner restrictions – for expressive matter vendors to display and sell their wares on
parkland.  These rules not only provide greater clarity for vendors regarding where and how they
can operate on parkland, they also ensure that our parks do not become so congested that they do
not provide the public with enjoyable and accessible open space.

The Department determined that it was necessary to promulgate these rules to address
concerns raised by park visitors, vendors, and other members of the public, as well as
Department staff, related to the proliferation, in certain parks, of expressive matter vendors and
the impact they can have on parkland and other park visitors.  In fact, in the absence of
Department rules regarding expressive matter vendors, the number of these vendors combined
for Battery Park, Central Park, and Union Square Park has almost tripled since 2001, when the
Department ended its old lottery system for vendor permits in these parks pursuant to the New
York City Administrative Code.  This dramatic increase in the number of vendors has resulted in
changed conditions in certain parks, which required the Department to develop regulations in
order to strike a balance between expressive matter vendors and other park visitors, and address
other concerns related to maintaining and operating open space under the jurisdiction of the
Department.

For example, expressive matter vendors at Union Square Park have increased, and
continue to increase, in number to the point where they occupy almost the entire south-west
corner of the park.  This not only presents a concern regarding potential hazardous and unsafe
conditions stemming from undue congestion and pedestrian gridlock, it also detracts from the
experience of those park visitors who wish to experience and enjoy the park in other ways.

Now I realize to many of you I may seem predisposed to bias for favor of the artists, so before I issue my counterpoints, I will provide a few links in the interest of being fair.

Robert Lederman: Robert is a NYC artist and activist (He is the head of a pro artist group called A.R.T.I.S.T.). Thanks to Robert’s tireless vigil we are able to display and sell (continue to display and sell) our art on the streets and in the parks of NYC.

Squaring Off: Post from NYC artist, writer, and dear friend Richard Kriheli  that offers more insight into the Parks Department’s motivation for requesting approval in amending the rules for vending.

NY Times: NY Times article presenting arguments for and against the proposed rule changes. Includes a full copy of the Dept. of Parks resolution.

Ok kiddies, here we go!

I’m not going to go in to all the 1st Amendment hoo ha, and allegations of privatization, those are arguments that have and are being made by others much more eloquent then I. My rebuttal represents the situation on the ground at a place I spend more then 40 hours a week, every week at.

1: The term “Expressive Matter Vendor“. This is a derogatory term and it is one I especially detest. While technically it is correct, it serves no other purpose then to offer no delineation between artists who create art and those who merely vend art. I’ve spent a lot of money on my education, and nearly all my adult life honing my eye and my craft. I am an effing Artist and don’t you forget it!

2: According to the Statement of Basis and Purpose “..the absence of
Department rules regarding expressive matter vendors, the number of these vendors combined
for Battery Park, Central Park, and Union Square Park has almost tripled since 2001, when the
Department ended its old lottery system for vendor permits in these parks pursuant to the New
York City Administrative Code.“

Absence of Department Rules? Are you kidding me? There are 60 plus pages of rules and regulations pertaining to vending on NYC Streets and in NYC Parks.  If you compare the Vending Rules for Artists as they have existed for at least the last ten years to what the Parks Department is proposing, you will find thing only thing that changes is that now they want to regulate number of artists in certain parks. The only thing that is absent is the enforcement of the existing rules. We will get into that one more later in this post.

3: “…the number of these vendors combined
for Battery Park, Central Park, and Union Square Park has almost tripled since 2001″

Ok, so where are these numbers coming from? Did the Parks Department conduct a census of artists in 2001, and then again in 2010? And where is the breakdown of numbers for each park and each year between 2001 and 2010 to substantiate such a claim? How many Artists and vendors where in the parks in 2008 vs. 2010. Do these numbers reflect the severe recession that is going on and the record number of people are unemployed? (nearly 10%) In any case there is a serious lack of evidence other to back up that statement. I would also like to point out (and this is a very important point they very conveniently leave out) There are numerous people who illegally vend in the parks. In NYC and under the 1st Amendment, Artists are allowed to sell and display their art on the streets and in the parks without a vending permit. If say you want to sell bullshit that is made in China you have to get a nearly impossible to obtain Vendor Permit. That being said, many vendors circumvent this by attempting mingle in with the artists in the parks. The day I counted 127 vendors, I counted 42 people illegally vending (selling jewelery, clothes, nick knacks, coffee mugs, cigarette lighters, dream catchers, pan flutes, beads, salt and pepper shakers, all manner of stuff deemed illegal to vend by the current rules). By days end nearly all of those vendors where still present.

4: My last point. “…For example, expressive matter vendors at Union Square Park have increased, and
continue to increase, in number to the point where they occupy almost the entire south-west
corner of the park.  This not only presents a concern regarding potential hazardous and unsafe
conditions stemming from undue congestion and pedestrian gridlock, it also detracts from the
experience of those park visitors who wish to experience and enjoy the park in other ways.“

Only on days where the Green Market is present  do the artists take up the south west corner of the park. And that is because the Market forces the artists to begin setting up in that location. In all honesty, when the Green Market is busiest (Saturdays during the summer months) it takes of the entirety of the north and west sides of the Park. As for “pedestrian gridlock”, anyone who attempts to venture through the Green Market on Saturdays will experience that to an infuriating degree. Even on the busiest days, it is still possible to move freely though the corridor occupied (in accordance with existing rules) by the artists. “…This not only presents a concern regarding potential hazardous and unsafe
conditions stemming from undue congestion.”

What a joke! I cite Exhibit A!

Pillow Fight, Union Square, April 2010

Ok, so they are so concerned with preventing hazardous and unsafe conditions due to the presence of a bunch of artists, but sanctioning a pillow fight involving  (with no permit and requiring dozens of police officers to regulate ingress and egress) a couple thousand and more people beating each other.  Maybe to you a pillow fight seems benign, but I saw first responders carting off people that had passed out in the fray, and in my own display they where treating a 7 year old boy (not even a participant, just passing through the park with his father) who was bashed in the face and covered in blood. Are you effing kidding me? This is acceptable to the Parks Department? Events like this pose no hazard to park goers?

In conclusion, the reasons for changing the existing rules have no basis in reality. They definitely do not reflect the situation on the ground. Last Wednesday I attended a Community Board Meeting (#6). At that meeting the chairman asked Deputy Parks Commissioner Bill Castro about enforcement of the existing rules, and if he felt there had been adequate enforcement for the rules as currently exist. The response was that he did not believe the rules have been enforced to the degree that they could be. I can personally vouch for that. There are days where I have literally spent 20 or more hours in the park. There are no shortage of PEP Officers (Parks Enforcement Police). I watch them stroll up and down the walkways occupied by artists. I watch them flirt with cute girls illegally vending jewelry. I watch them shake hands and do fist pounds with vendors who engage in the practice of buying and selling spots (completely illegal, and an act of privatization) .  Rarely do I see them issue tickets, and even rarer is the instance of removing a vendor who is operating illegally. In short the enforcement of current policy regarding “expressive matter vendors” is completely non existent. They want us to believe that if these rules are allowed to be changed, they will create a better park going experience. They want us to believe that after 10 years of virtually no enforcement they are suddenly going to enforce policy knowledgeably and fairly? Yeah right.. So now the PEP Officers are going to be on duty 24 hours a day in order to insure the 18 spots in USP are delegated fairly. PLEASE!  Need I remind you that 15 years ago Union Square Park was a redoubt for junkies and criminals (hence the name “Needle Park”). Most people avoided the area like the plague. If these rules are passed, they will do nothing more then secure an embarrassing legacy for all those involved. It will guarantee new additions to the unemployment rolls, already at an all time high. It will create an artist diaspora that will be felt city wide.

Around 2200 words ago I asked you what NYC symbolized to you? To me it symbolizes the epitome of the American Dream. It is the only place where there is a market for anything. It is the only place where the mantra “if you can dream it, you can do it” exists. How many movies have been made about the dreamers who come from humble origins to endure trial and tribulation to attain success they never thought possible. That is NY. That is the essence of this city that courses through my veins everyday. For all of its sometimes seamy underbelly, I love selling my art in the park. I love the many talented artists I have met, most of whom I call friends. Never in my life have I had the good fortune to work with and befriend people from all over the world. It truly is amazing and sublime. And it is the quintessential New York experience. If they take it away, they will be taking away and essential piece of the cultural fabric of  New York City.

Don’t let them!

There is a public hearing at Chelsea Recreation Center (430 West 25th Street) on April 23 at 11AM. There will be a protest at 10AM. In addition you can write and voice our opinion to the following before April 23rd:

Alessandro G. Olivieri, General Counsel, Department of Parks &
Recreation, The Arsenal, Central Park, 830 Fifth Avenue, New York, New
York 10065, by April 23, 2010. You may also write him at this email

address: alessandro.olivieri@parks.nyc.gov

You should also send the same email to the Parks Commissioner,
Adrian Benepe.
His email address is:
Adrian.Benepe@parks.nyc.gov

Finally I will leave you with a link to this video. It is an inspiring and informative speech given to the USP artists by Robert Lederman last Saturday.

Tomorrow night I meet with the Senior Art students, chatting one on one about their artwork.  I am really excited to hear their ideas and see what they are working on. Should be fun. Hopefully, I will be almost finished with my fourth large painting by the end of tomorrow.  Busy week.  Thursday I head to DC to visit a friend, see Sue Johnson’s art show at Washington Project for the Arts as well as see the wonderful art museums!  Should be fun!

The Artist House is fantastic.  Since it is associated with St. Mary’s College, I get all the perks of college.  They have a state of the art swimming pool, so you guessed it.  I am swimming every day. They also have scanners at my service, hence how I am able to display my daily ink drawings here on this blog. I have all these new ideas! My new painting currently has an elephant emerging! I hope to finish that tomorrow or Sunday.

I have giving a talk on Tuesday September 8th at 4:15 p.m. in the Boyden Gallery.  I am almost prepared.  Still editing my slides.  I didn’t realize I have been so productive over the last 4 1/2 years.

Hope you enjoy my works in progress.

So I guess I will start with updates.

*Michael has immersed himself into the freelance photography realm and I have to say he is doing quite well.  If you would like to say hello to him, you can find him in Union Sq. NYC on the beautiful market days.  So go get that amazing fresh juice or baked good and stop by to see Michael’s wonderful Gelatin Acrylic Transfers.  If I do say so, they are only getting better! His bookmark (business card) alone is worth the trip.  Also if you are a fan, he does $10 off Canvas Fridays.

*I have 4 paintings hanging in a Peruvian Restaurant called El Pollo located at 291 5th Ave Brooklyn, NY and  4 other paintings in the Boyden Gallery in St. Mary’s Maryland. I know this is not photography, but it is still pretty cool to check out!

*Michael has two photographs hanging at Bierkraft located at 191 5th Ave Brooklyn, NY 11217.  If you are a beer connoisseur, this is the place to go.  His images are quite ironic in this space.

We have tons of new gear to talk about:  The Canon ipf6200, our new baby.  This thing is incredibly brilliant.  We will divulge more information soon.  I also just got the Kodak Zx1.  I will soon be putting together a little movie to show you it’s magic.  So please stay tuned.

This week I am off to the Maine Media Workshops.  I am taking a class with John Goodman called In Search of the Personal.  The first assignment was to read The Ongoing Moment by Geoff Dyer.  When I finish it, I will let you know how it goes.  I hope to give you some updates while I am out there.  This should be exciting.  I also get to see Christopher James, which is always a treat.

Also the TruthBeauty: Pictorialism and the Photograph as Art, 1845-1945 exhibit at the Eastman House is quite phenomenal. The autochrome images were my favorite within the show! I wish I could do this process! Who would have known a potato could make color photographs.

The next exhibit I recommend is the Walker Evans and the Picture Postcard at the Metropolitan Museum. This show is running until May 25th. Apparently Walker Evans collected over 9,000 postcards starting from his childhood continuing for more than 60 years. This exhibit was highly informational giving interesting facts about postcard history, but also insight on another way for us to interpret Walker Evans photographs. What he seemed to like about the postcards was this simplicity in the ordinary, which is demonstrated within his own pieces. Walker Evans was quirky classifying his postcards into Summer, Hotels, American Architecture, Automobiles, Outdoor pleasures, State capitols and well the list goes on. Since I live in NYC one fact I learned was that in 1905 The Saturday Evening Post had stated that over 250,000 postcards were mailed from Coney Island! Who would have known!

This Friday April 24, 2009 I will be checking out Isaac Stackell, a friend, Alternate Visions show at SMP Digital Graphics Gallery 135 West 20th Street NYC. The show ends April 30, 2009.